Utah Hairbraiding

Brushing Out Utah’s African Hairbraiding Laws
Clayton v. Steinagel

IJ Client Jestina Clayton.

Utah braiding video
Watch IJ's video, "Untangling African Hairbraiders from Utah's Cosmetology Regime"

The Constitution protects the right to earn an honest living without arbitrary and unreasonable government interference.

But if you want to braid hair for a living in Utah, you must submit yourself to a completely irrational licensing scheme to get permission from the government before you are allowed to work.

Jestina Clayton, a college graduate, wife, mother of two and refugee from Sierra Leone’s civil war has been braiding hair for most of her life.  Now she wants to use her considerable skills to help provide for her family while her husband finishes his education.  But the state of Utah says she may not be paid to braid unless she first spends thousands of dollars on 2,000 hours of government-mandated cosmetology training—not one hour of which actually teaches her how to braid hair.  In the same number of class hours, a person also could qualify to be an armed security guard, mortgage loan originator, real estate sales agent, EMT and lawyer—combined.  Such arbitrary and excessive government-imposed licensing on such an ordinary, safe and uncomplicated practice as hairbraiding is not only outrageous, it is unconstitutional.

Jestina pled her case to the Utah’s licensing board and to Utah legislators but to no avail.  That is why on April 26, 2011, the Institute for Justice (IJ) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of Utah to challenge Utah’s hairbraiding regulations.

Making hairbraiders get an expensive and irrelevant cosmetology license serves only one purpose:  to protect the cosmetology industry from competition and stifle Jestina’s right to pursue her occupation of choice.  African hairbraiding is a centuries-old natural hair care technique that uses no dyes or chemicals; it is safe for the braider to perform and does not hurt the person getting their hair braided.  And with Utah’s increasingly diverse population growing through adoption and migration, the need for African hairbraiders in the state is growing.

The ramifications of this lawsuit extend far beyond braiding.  Occupational licensing laws in all 50 states restrict entry into hundreds of professions.  In the 1950s, less than five percent of the workforce was required to obtain a government license to do their job.  Today, that number exceeds 30 percent.  There are now more than 1,100 different occupations that require a government license in at least one state.

No one should have to hire a lawyer or lobbyist just to braid hair.  The right to earn an honest living is an essential part of our nation’s promise of opportunity.


Essential Background

Images

Background on the Utah Hairbraiding case

Client Photo

Launch Release: African Hairbraider Files Federal Suit To Untangle Utah’s Cosmetology Regime (April 25, 2011)

Client Video


Legal Briefs and Decisions

none available

Case Timeline

Filed Lawsuit:

 

April 26, 2011

Court Filed:

U.S. District Court for the District of Utah

Status:

 

TBD

Next Key Date:

 

none

 

Additional Releases

Maps, Charts and Facts

 none available

none available

 

 

Op-eds, News Articles and Links

Article: Returning to Our Roots: IJ Returns to Court to Defend Hairbraiders' Right to Earn an Honest Living; Liberty & Law (June 2011)

Article: Regulation is a cancer John Stossel (June 7, 2011)

Article: Hair braider says Utah cosmetology law is unfair AP (April 30, 2011)

Article: Woman sues over need for license to braid hair Salt Lake Tribune (April 26, 2011)

Email Address
Please enter a valid email address
Share

Institute for Justice
901 N. Glebe Road, Suite 900
Arlington, VA 22203
Tel 703.682.9320, Fax 703.682.9321
© 1997-2012